Tag List Report
The following document contains the listing of user tags found in the code. Below is the summary of the occurrences per tag.
| Tag Class | Total number of occurrences | Tag strings used by tag class |
|---|---|---|
| Todo Work | 45 | TODO, FIXME |
Each tag is detailed below:
Todo Work
Number of occurrences found in the code: 45
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.datatype.IDataTypeAdapter | Line |
|---|---|
| move to IAnyAtomicItem | 129 |
| markup types are not atomic values. Figure out a better base type (i.e., IValuedItem) | 140 |
| move to IAnyAtomicItem | 142 |
| move to IAnyAtomicItem | 155 |
| migrate code to XML parser implementation. | 208 |
| migrate code to JSON parser implementation. | 221 |
| migrate code to XML parser implementation. | 261 |
| migrate code to JSON parser implementation. | 282 |
| migrate code to XML writer implementation. | 308 |
| migrate code to XML writer implementation. | 330 |
| migrate code to JSON writer implementation. | 344 |
| migrate code to JSON implementations. | 353 |
| migrate code to XML implementations. | 363 |
| migrate code to XML implementations. | 372 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.datatype.adapter.DateTimeAdapter | Line |
| bring up to spec | 102 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.datatype.markup.AbstractMarkupAdapter | Line |
| verify that read/write methods cannot be generalized in the base class | 50 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.datatype.markup.MarkupLine | Line |
| find a way to do a deep copy this is a shallow copy that uses the same underlying Document object | 100 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.datatype.markup.MarkupMultiline | Line |
| find a way to do a deep copy this is a shallow copy that uses the same underlying Document object | 66 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.datatype.markup.flexmark.FixedEmphasisDelimiterProcessor | Line |
| remove this class once vsch/flexmark-java#580 is merged | 24 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.datatype.markup.flexmark.MarkupXmlStreamWriter | Line |
| Is this orphaned code needed? | 20 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.metapath.DynamicContext | Line |
| add support for in-scope namespaces | 35 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.metapath.ICollectionValue | Line |
| rename to toSequence and resolve conflicting methods? | 23 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.metapath.ISequence | Line |
| Is a safe stream needed here? | 187 |
| remove null check on callers | 308 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.metapath.StaticMetapathException | Line |
| need a Metapath grammar link | 20 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.metapath.cst.BuildCSTVisitor | Line |
| handle additional syntax for varef and parenthesized | 390 |
| implement kind test | 726 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.metapath.cst.math.Division | Line |
| find a way to support this | 76 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.metapath.format.JsonPathFormatter | Line |
| does it make sense to use this for an intermediate that has no parent? retval = formatModelPathSegment(segment); } return retval; } | 80 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.metapath.format.MetapathFormatter | Line |
| does it make sense to use this for an intermediate that has no parent? | 49 |
| does it make sense to use this for an intermediate that has no parent? | 55 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.metapath.function.DefaultFunction | Line |
| apply cast to atomic type } | 169 |
| implement something like computeIfAbsent attempt to get the result from the cache | 221 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.metapath.item.atomic.IAtomicValuedItem | Line |
| review all implementations and uses for correct behavior related to null | 21 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.metapath.item.atomic.IBase64BinaryItemTest | Line |
| use equals method? | 45 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.metapath.item.node.MockNodeItemFactory | Line |
| Integrate with classes in gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.testing | 29 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.model.AbstractNamedModelInstance | Line |
| look for ways to avoid this cast. The problem is that IContainerModel is not easily generalized, since this interface is extended by core model interfaces. Perhaps moving default implementation into abstract or concrete implementation is a possible path? | 38 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.model.IModelDefinition | Line |
| remove once moved to the instance side | 73 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.model.INamedModelInstance | Line |
| remove once moved to the instance side | 56 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.model.constraint.AbstractConstraintValidationHandler | Line |
| render the key paths | 155 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.model.validation.XmlSchemaContentValidator | Line |
| verify source input streams are closed | 52 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.model.xml.ModuleLoader | Line |
| It's very odd that the system id looks like this. Need to investigate. | 143 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.model.xml.impl.MarkupStringConverter | Line |
| is this needed, or can we use methods on the markup implementations? | 23 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.model.xml.impl.ModelFactory | Line |
| figure out how to resolve the namespace prefix on var | 500 |
| gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.core.model.xml.impl.XmlModule | Line |
| switch implementation to use the XmlObjectParser | 251 |